The
summer issue (2012) of the Journal of
Scientific Exploration (JSE) has several interesting articles, one of which
is “Revisiting the Alexander UFO
Religious Crisis Survey (AUFORCS): Is There Really a Crisis?” written by
Jeff Levin. Jeff Levin is associated with the Institute for Studies of
Religion, Baylor University, Waco, Texas. The JSE article reviews the AUFORCS survey and results.
The
analysis includes the purpose of the survey, the AUFORCS survey method, breakdown
of participants and response rate. Part I includes the eleven survey questions
from the Victoria Alexander UFO Religious Crisis Survey. I conclude the article
with my own observations about the survey, methods used, the eleven survey
questions, and the overall statistical value of the Alexander UFO Religious
Crisis Survey.
The
Peters ETI Religious Crisis Survey of 2008 is reviewed. The focal question
stated in the background section of the survey in (Section 1.1) reads, “Would either the Christian religion or
selected non-Christian religions confront a crisis or even collapse when
confronted with confirmation that extraterrestrial intelligent life exists?”
The authors propose that the Peters survey disconfirms the hypothesis.
The
survey methods are described by who their respondents are and how the surveys
were distributed. There are a number of statistical problems with the Peters
ETI Religious Crisis Survey and a number of them are discussed. The final
results are presented with my comments about the lack of detail about the
survey distribution, response rate, standard deviation, confidence intervals, z
and p values, and bias in the survey.
The
ten survey questions are posted and mention is made that the email version of
the survey was different than the paper surveys. I discuss how the use of
italics in some of the survey questions is biased and my conclusions about the
Peters survey.
The
UFOs & Extraterrestrial Life: Americans’ Beliefs and Personal Experiences: The
Roper Poll, Prepared for the SCI FI Channel, Sept 2002 is presented. As a
result of the Roper Poll’s lack of computational data to verify their results,
I am disinclined to believe the report and provide more detail why I come to
this conclusion.
The
Reactions to Receipt of a Message from Extraterrestrial Intelligence: A
Cross-Cultural Empirical Study was written by D. A. Vakoch and Y. S. Lee. The
study was presented at the SETI: Interdisciplinary Aspects Review Meeting, 48th
International Astronautical Congress in Turin, Italy in 1997.
Purpose
of the survey: If the earth ever received a message from extraterrestrial
intelligence, what would be the societal impact?
In
my view, this survey was the best conducted survey I had reviewed. I was
impressed with the quality of detail provided. The methods, statistics and
results were solid and gave me hope that there was someone doing some solid
work about the religious view on extraterrestrial life.
Another
paper, published in the Journal of UFO
Studies in 1980, addressed the testing of two hypotheses:
1)
Many denominations have not yet taken a position on the issue of whether there
is extraterrestrial life.
2)
Christian religious fundamentalism is inversely related to belief in
extraterrestrial life.
It
boils down to the willingness to believe in extraterrestrial life. This is
based on the fact that extraterrestrial life is not a scientific fact. Survey
methods and results are presented.
The
final part of the article provides concluding thoughts on all five surveys from
the first three parts of the series, Part I – Part III.
Part
IV starts with the search for ETI from a historical perspective. Highlights are
given from the thoughts and ideas of historical figures who were interested in
the subject. Historical highlights starting with the early years from 1277 to
the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries are briefly presented. The nineteenth
and twentieth centuries features William Whewell, who published Of the Plurality of Worlds: An Essay,
and Alfred Russell Wallace’s Man’s Place
in the Universe. The twentieth century finishes with the 1952 Vatican pronouncement,
and a short mention of Percival Lowell, Orson Welles, and the Drake Equation.
The
second section discusses the hypothesis that religion could be a survival
strategy for communities. The views of Jonathan Haidt are reviewed and a story was
presented from a telecast during the 2012 Summer Olympics, regarding how
Winston Churchill reached out to America for Britain’s World War II war effort.
As
with previous posts in this series, history has shown us that people have been
debating the existence of extraterrestrial intelligence for many centuries.
There is a rich depth of history on this topic and there are many fascinating papers
and books on the subject. There are numerous viewpoints on the relationship
between ETI and religion. As with many controversial topics, the viewpoint of
ETI seems to resolve itself into two camps: those who feel that ETI is not inconsistent
with religion, and those who say it is. These viewpoints come from laymen,
scientists, theologians, ufologists, and everyone in between.
What
struck me personally in reading papers on this topic is not only the black and
white perspective on this issue but the human perception of how we, as
humanity, project our religious viewpoints onto an extraterrestrial
intelligence. Has ET sinned? How is ET redeemed? How does ET relate to
humanity’s position in the universe? Does humanity have a “position” in the
universe? Even more than that, does humanity have a special or ultimate
position in the universe? I was disturbed at reading the absolute perspective
of the religious viewpoint being projected onto an extraterrestrial
intelligence. Who are we to dictate our religious views onto an alien
intelligence? What makes our way the only way?
Part
V continues with viewpoints from Douglas Vakoch’s research, Joesph L. Spradley,
Marie George, Brenda Denzler, David Wilkinson, and Paul Davis. The multiple
Incarnation issue is presented with different viewpoints. The next section
introduces the question of ET as spiritual Beings, life on Mars, and Frank
Drake and SETI, followed by the conclusion of what constitutes a religion.
Part
VI focuses on the fundamentalist religious views of ETI. Who can forget the
statement by Pat Robertson, the founder and chairman of the Christian Coalition,
advocating stoning for those who believe in the existence of space aliens and
UFOs?
Some
abductees have found that their experiences have reinforced their religious
faith. Other abductees ascribe their experiences to demonic activity. You get
the entire spectrum of belief between these extremes. Brenda Denzler writes
about these contradictions in “Ufology,
God-Talk and Theology”. Several different perspectives by abductees are
presented. Quotes from Billy Graham, who is an American Christian evangelist,
are featured.
Dr. David Clarke wrote a paper titled “Flying Saucers From Hell” and this paper
contains a wealth of information about how demonology has played a very
influential and largely overlooked role in the development of ufology both in
the United States and Britain.
Gordon
Creighton was the best-known demonologist in the UK and he was also the editor
for Flying
Saucer Review. Paul Inglesby, also known as “Father Paul” or the Reverend
Eric Inglesby, was a UFO theorist who had many contacts with both the church
and the British establishment.
The
CE4 Research Group’s alienresistance.org is discussed. This website has
“testimonies” from people who have claimed to stop alien abduction by using the
power in the name and authority of Jesus Christ. There are statements of faith,
articles, and position statements on alien abduction. I do not have a favorable
view regarding the statements this group makes about alien abduction.
The
church metaphors in both versions of the War of the Worlds movies are
compared. The conclusion of part VI presents my personal views about ET,
demons, and angels.